
Keep in mind that while scoring criteria should certainly be utilized to help reach membership decisions, it should not be the only factor you are considering. A common pitfall in utilizing a scoring technique is comparing different types of candidates to the same scores.
For example, comparing a candidate in their freshman year to a candidate in their senior year. Oftentimes the senior may score higher in these areas (if unweighted), however, the freshmen should not automatically be disqualified from membership considering it should be expected the freshman has more room to grow throughout their college career.
Another way around this is by establishing different scoring criteria or expectations based off the potential new member's year in school. Be sure to also be mindful about unconscious bias during recruitment and use every effort to remain impartial during candidate assessments. This is especially important when you have had previous interactions with candidates, or if it is not their first time going through the recruitment process.
One of the more difficult parts of the recruitment process is evaluating candidates. Each chapter should establish a fair and equal way of evaluating candidates on their qualities and skills. A common way of scoring candidates is by utilizing a rubric format with a variety of criteria.
Some areas to consider evaluating:
Communication skills
Ability to work in a team
Current leadership abilities/potential for leadership opportunities
Problem solving and/or critical thinking skills
Past Experience
Other groups, volunteering, or work
Interview Performance